<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Hybrid Or Not To Hybrid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankaholic.com/to-hybrid-or-not-to-hybrid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/to-hybrid-or-not-to-hybrid/</link>
	<description>Compare the Best CD (Certificate of Deposit) Rates, Highest Money Market Rates, Best Savings Accounts, Bank Deals, Interest Rates and Bank Reviews!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:42:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike M</title>
		<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/to-hybrid-or-not-to-hybrid/comment-page-1/#comment-176291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankaholic.com/?p=5240#comment-176291</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but Edmonds is FAR from authoritative here.  They&#039;ve grossly underestimated the price premium for the Camry hybrid and grossly overestimated the premium for the Fusion hybrid.  The result is that their analysis is useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but Edmonds is FAR from authoritative here.  They&#8217;ve grossly underestimated the price premium for the Camry hybrid and grossly overestimated the premium for the Fusion hybrid.  The result is that their analysis is useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crankysaver</title>
		<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/to-hybrid-or-not-to-hybrid/comment-page-1/#comment-176288</link>
		<dc:creator>crankysaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankaholic.com/?p=5240#comment-176288</guid>
		<description>Edmonds.com is a pretty authoritative source of data on stuff like car prices. Here&#039;s a link to the original story that offers payback times for a wide range of models, plus diesels:

http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/07/diesels-paying-back-quicker-than-hybrids-edmundscom-reports.html

This is a link to a followup story that deals mostly with revising Toyota payback times:

http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/08/updated-data-revises-some-hybrid-payback-times.html

And here’s a post from Edmunds Green Car Advisor that lists every hybrid and diesel model (as of last July) and its price, fuel economy and “premium” over a conventional counterpart:

http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2009/07/still-shopping-with-big-rebates-hybrids-and-diesels-can-be-attractive.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edmonds.com is a pretty authoritative source of data on stuff like car prices. Here&#8217;s a link to the original story that offers payback times for a wide range of models, plus diesels:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/07/diesels-paying-back-quicker-than-hybrids-edmundscom-reports.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/07/diesels-paying-back-quicker-than-hybrids-edmundscom-reports.html</a></p>
<p>This is a link to a followup story that deals mostly with revising Toyota payback times:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/08/updated-data-revises-some-hybrid-payback-times.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoobserver.com/2009/08/updated-data-revises-some-hybrid-payback-times.html</a></p>
<p>And here’s a post from Edmunds Green Car Advisor that lists every hybrid and diesel model (as of last July) and its price, fuel economy and “premium” over a conventional counterpart:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2009/07/still-shopping-with-big-rebates-hybrids-and-diesels-can-be-attractive.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2009/07/still-shopping-with-big-rebates-hybrids-and-diesels-can-be-attractive.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M</title>
		<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/to-hybrid-or-not-to-hybrid/comment-page-1/#comment-176252</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankaholic.com/?p=5240#comment-176252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how they come up with under two years.  There isn&#039;t even a link to find this story.

According to owner data at fueleconomy.gov, Camry hybrid owners are averaging 36.7 mpg and I4 owners are getting 26.1.  Comparably equipped, a Camry LE will cost $3922 less (invoice) than the hybrid.

At 15,000 miles per year, that&#039;s 409 gallons for the hybrid and 575
 gallons for the non-hybrid.  At $2.53 per gallon, that&#039;s $1034 for the hybrid and $1454 for the non-hybrid.

So you&#039;re paying $3922 to save $420 per year in gas.  At 2% interest, that&#039;s over 10 years to pay that extra back, NOT &quot;under 2&quot;.

By comparison, the Ford Fusion comes in at 40.2 mpg (hybrid) and 28.9 mpg (nonhybrid).  Unfortunately, the Fusion hybrid only comes with high trim lines.... but then the Fusion hybrid is only $1009 more than a comparably equipped SEL.  The hybrid doesn&#039;t have leather, so tack on $1000 for that difference in equipment.  So that&#039;s $2009 difference.   At 15k miles per year and 2% interest, it pays back in just under 6 years.... a FAR better rate of return than the Camry hybrid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how they come up with under two years.  There isn&#8217;t even a link to find this story.</p>
<p>According to owner data at fueleconomy.gov, Camry hybrid owners are averaging 36.7 mpg and I4 owners are getting 26.1.  Comparably equipped, a Camry LE will cost $3922 less (invoice) than the hybrid.</p>
<p>At 15,000 miles per year, that&#8217;s 409 gallons for the hybrid and 575<br />
 gallons for the non-hybrid.  At $2.53 per gallon, that&#8217;s $1034 for the hybrid and $1454 for the non-hybrid.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re paying $3922 to save $420 per year in gas.  At 2% interest, that&#8217;s over 10 years to pay that extra back, NOT &#8220;under 2&#8243;.</p>
<p>By comparison, the Ford Fusion comes in at 40.2 mpg (hybrid) and 28.9 mpg (nonhybrid).  Unfortunately, the Fusion hybrid only comes with high trim lines&#8230;. but then the Fusion hybrid is only $1009 more than a comparably equipped SEL.  The hybrid doesn&#8217;t have leather, so tack on $1000 for that difference in equipment.  So that&#8217;s $2009 difference.   At 15k miles per year and 2% interest, it pays back in just under 6 years&#8230;. a FAR better rate of return than the Camry hybrid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basicmoneytips</title>
		<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/to-hybrid-or-not-to-hybrid/comment-page-1/#comment-176089</link>
		<dc:creator>basicmoneytips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankaholic.com/?p=5240#comment-176089</guid>
		<description>Good post - you have to do a lot of in town driving to make a hybrid pay for itself.

However, if you look at the bigger picture for what you are doing for the environment as well as the money you are saving in gas, I say go for it.

If you are only looking at the savings in gas, you can probably beat it with a 4 cylinder small car of some type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post &#8211; you have to do a lot of in town driving to make a hybrid pay for itself.</p>
<p>However, if you look at the bigger picture for what you are doing for the environment as well as the money you are saving in gas, I say go for it.</p>
<p>If you are only looking at the savings in gas, you can probably beat it with a 4 cylinder small car of some type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
