<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fine Print of Credit Card Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankaholic.com/finance/fine-print-of-credit-card-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/finance/fine-print-of-credit-card-applications/</link>
	<description>Blogging about personal finance and economic policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zanya g.</title>
		<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/finance/fine-print-of-credit-card-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-35725</link>
		<dc:creator>zanya g.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 04:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankaholic.com/finance/fine-print-of-credit-card-applications/#comment-35725</guid>
		<description>Consumers were supposedly going to be protected by the 2009 CARD Act. The 2009 bill has provisions that are going into impact throughout this year. One provision of bill needs something simple. That credit cannot be issued unless the person getting the credit can prove that they can repay the obligation. The bill is causing some severe unintentional consequences, however. Stay-at-home spouses are very possibly going to be losing financial freedom, under the provisions of this bill. Here is the proof: &lt;a title=&quot;CARD Act could strip stay-at-home partners of financial identity&quot; href=&quot;http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/04/15/card-act-stay-at-home/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CARD Act could strip say-at-home partners of financial identity&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumers were supposedly going to be protected by the 2009 CARD Act. The 2009 bill has provisions that are going into impact throughout this year. One provision of bill needs something simple. That credit cannot be issued unless the person getting the credit can prove that they can repay the obligation. The bill is causing some severe unintentional consequences, however. Stay-at-home spouses are very possibly going to be losing financial freedom, under the provisions of this bill. Here is the proof: <a title="CARD Act could strip stay-at-home partners of financial identity" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2011/04/15/card-act-stay-at-home/" rel="nofollow">CARD Act could strip say-at-home partners of financial identity</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bankaholic.com/finance/fine-print-of-credit-card-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-25251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankaholic.com/finance/fine-print-of-credit-card-applications/#comment-25251</guid>
		<description>Almost nothing of this article is &quot;fine print&quot;. You should re-name it &quot;credit card basics&quot;.

I came here thinking I would learn something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost nothing of this article is &#8220;fine print&#8221;. You should re-name it &#8220;credit card basics&#8221;.</p>
<p>I came here thinking I would learn something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

