Comments on: Chase Drops Controversial Credit Card Fee

By: Maximara

Maximara — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:58:07 +0000

Mike, you really don’t get it. Life of the loan means LIFE OF THE LOAN. If anyone else did this they would be in court for breach of contract so fast that it would make their heads spin and lose big.

By: Chuck W

Chuck W — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:06:24 +0000

Mike, I think you overlooked the fact that the customers had a contract which specified that the low interest rate was to be kept for the life of the loan on balances transferred. Chase is not the first bank who has tried to weasel out of honoring a contract similar to this.

By: Mike M

Mike M — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:10:37 +0000

People really need to learn about their ability to legally opt-out of changes. If they’re presented with such a change to their card agreement, they have the right to opt out of the changes, with the understanding that the bank then has the right to choose to close down the account.

Nothing would have prevented Chase customers from saying “thanks, but no thanks, I don’t want these new changes”. They would have had to find a new credit card to buy things with, but they could have continued to pay down their balance at no more than 4.99% and without any monthly fee.

The only thing Chase did wrong in this case is that when customers called, they weren’t being clearly given the choice to opt out. They were told they could have the $10 per month fee or a higher interest rate. They should have been given the third option.

Had they done that, they would have been doing nothing wrong. Any claims that they should be forced to keep the same terms with open accounts indefinitely are silly…

By: Bankaholic | Top Finance Blog

Bankaholic | Top Finance Blog — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:31:24 +0000

[...] Bankaholic also gives you the most current information on bank rates, credit card interest rates, insurance rates, and then other current financial news, such as one of his latest stories called Chase Drops Controversial Credit Card Fee. [...]

By: itsnotademocracy

itsnotademocracy — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:48:54 +0000

reneging on a contract? surely not! But wait….how come it’s OK for the AG of NY and the President to reneg on contracts with AIG employees? Oh right…that was different…they weren’t ‘popular’. There was an angry mob of citizens being incited by the media to throw bricks through the windows of anyone who dares work at AIG.
Why should Chase play by the rule of law? Godbama doesn’t.
Maybe Chase should just start a campaign to demonize these customers so that everyone in America dumbly follows the herd and thinks they are ‘bad’. Then it will be totally OK to persecute them.
…I believe that was the way one bad Austrian played it back in the Third Reich…